Quoted from Meddler

Like User, I am aware that only 40% of comments are supportive so far.

Doesn't sound like User.

Quoted from Meddler

I understand there's going to be another survey in the new year.

Haven't heard that - just that the result was 'inconclusive' and a headache to the WBC committee that is running the show. It was going to be submitted to planning in January, I guess that may be delayed.

I would imagine that the jist of any other survey will be along the lines of have it (in the park), or lump it (have it nowhere).

Quoted from Greenham Common

I would imagine that the jist of any other survey will be along the lines of have it (in the park), or lump it (have it nowhere).

Well, lump it might be a good conclusion and then NTC can perhaps get on with an improved parks grant application without major interference from WBC and we can have a restored park which we can all enjoy now and into the future as a green space.

That leaves Greenham Arts in a bit of a quandry as they want it out of Greenham Park. OK then rebuild the Waterside and stick all the spurious stuff in it. I'm sure the architects can rise to the occaison.

Quoted from Greenham Common

I would imagine that the jist of any other survey will be along the lines of have it (in the park), or lump it (have it nowhere).

You may be right - but I hope not.  If it goes against them it would be a great shame that we couldn't get an arts centre in town somewhere.

Quoted from blackdog

You may be right - but I hope not.  If it goes against them it would be a great shame that we couldn't get an arts centre in town somewhere.

If the pavilion scheme falls through, rest assured that Greenham will come up with, in conjunction with WBC and of course the favoured architect, a new plan. They want the arts stuff out of the way.
Anyway, WBC should be a bit more forthright with NGT as the trust is not actually doing us a favour. Despite all their 'good guys' posturing, Greenham belongs to us and we have a right to the surplus income.