Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
More effective opposition from Lib Dems on WBC?
Newbury.net - A Community website for Newbury, Berkshire, UK    News    News Stories from newbury.net  ›  More effective opposition from Lib Dems on WBC?
Users Browsing Forum
No Members and 7 Guests

More effective opposition from Lib Dems on WBC?  This thread currently has 5,666 views. Print
6 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 All Recommend Thread
noobree
June 29, 2011, 12:05pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 394
Posts Per Day: 0.40
Quoted from richard.garvie
I reckon they have cut their losses on this thread, don't want to answer the questions so will just ignore it and hope it goes away!!!


Funnily enough that was one of the two ways of dealing with my posts that I was going to recommend to User had he not been sent to WBC's equivalent of the Lubyanka.  The other way I thought they should respond would have been better, but either approach improved on what he actually did.  
Logged
Private Message Reply: 75 - 86
CharlieFarrow
June 29, 2011, 1:59pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 19
Posts Per Day: 0.05
Quoted from blackdog
Everyone seems to think that this job is something new.  It's not - WBC have employed people to act as party administrators for years, I know the chap who had the job with the Tories when they were in opposition.


That chap would be me! I'm not generally called a chap so must be Steve who took over from me...

Richard Garvie would not want this job paid or unpaid as it's 'politically restricted'.

See info from CPON:
http://cpon.info/what-is-a-poltical-assistant/
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 76 - 86
user23.3
June 29, 2011, 4:23pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 1,664
Posts Per Day: 1.51
Quoted from richard.garvie
I reckon they have cut their losses on this thread, don't want to answer the questions so will just ignore it and hope it goes away!!!
I thought I had made it clear that as the bloke is obviously a WUM I wouldn't be responding to him in this thread any more.

Following that he seems to have spent a proportion of Friday night talking to himself on the Internet, which only seems to confirm this.

Hope this clears things up.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 77 - 86
noobree
June 29, 2011, 5:51pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 394
Posts Per Day: 0.40
Quoted from user23.3
Following that he seems to have spent a proportion of Friday night talking to himself on the Internet...


Eh?  Oh I see.  No, I just type a lot faster than you do: didn't take long.  And this thread has had 1500 views. Nothing like the over 20,000 (!) for the skateboard park thread but it's more than just you, Richard and me.

Look, User, I know you mean well but when you attack a person rather than the point they're making people tend to assume that you're not very confident about the strength of your arguments.  

My original point was that, in these straightened times, this post would be ideally suited to one or more volunteers and that, given our local politicians will be expecting front line staff to take a hit in the name of reducing the deficit, they should have used unpaid staff for this post.

You're welcome to disagree but so far that's all you have done.  You haven't advanced any arguments.  Suggesting that I 'bluster' and am a 'wind up merchant' isnt' the same as advancing a coherent argument.   Do you see?

Now, I think it's probably the case that you're getting grumpy about this because you don't have any arguments.  That's fair enough, but don't shoot yourself in the foot by using ad hominem attacks.

I hope that's helpful.  Have a pleasant evening.

Logged
Private Message Reply: 78 - 86
richard.garvie
June 29, 2011, 6:20pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 1,074
Posts Per Day: 1.73
What is a WUM?
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 79 - 86
Greenham Common
June 29, 2011, 6:27pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 1,974
Gender: Male
Posts Per Day: 1.80
Location: Equine way
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 80 - 86
richard.garvie
June 29, 2011, 6:45pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 1,074
Posts Per Day: 1.73
I'm obviously not down with the kids!!!

For those who were also confused, WUM means "wind up merchant".
Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 81 - 86
ChristopherE
June 30, 2011, 1:13pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
I still find LOL a bit of a joke.
ce
Logged
Reply: 82 - 86
Muddler
July 5, 2011, 11:35am Report to Moderator

Posts: 496
Gender: Male
Posts Per Day: 0.45
Location: Cartergrad 2025
Well, Shropshire council's got an interesting approach to cutting taxpayer's bills

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-shropshire-14028188
Logged
Private Message Reply: 83 - 86
spartacus
July 5, 2011, 5:35pm Report to Moderator

Posts: 327
Posts Per Day: 0.30
Quoted from 680
I still find LOL a bit of a joke.
Lots of Love?

Logged Offline
Private Message Reply: 84 - 86
ChristopherE
July 5, 2011, 6:18pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Seems to be" Laughing out Loud". And being an old grump would never dream of doing so.
Don't quote me, have yet to use smilies...
I guess somethings help when you are not exactly agreeing or disagreeing. Just being a pain.http://www.newbury.net/blahdocs/Smilies/cool.png
Logged
Reply: 85 - 86
ChristopherE
July 5, 2011, 6:20pm Report to Moderator
Guest User
Well that went down the pan so I won't waste everyone's time again.
ChristopherE
Logged
Reply: 86 - 86
6 Pages « 1 2 3 4 5 6 All Recommend Thread
Print

Newbury.net - A Community website for Newbury, Berkshire, UK    News    News Stories from newbury.net  ›  More effective opposition from Lib Dems on WBC?